Medical Device Documentation: 4 Critical Failures When Working with Chinese Manufacturers

The overlooked crisis in medical device documentation?

It doesn’t happen at the FDA audit. It doesn’t happen during CE submission. It happens silently — during early engineering handoffs and uncontrolled revisions with Chinese manufacturers.

We’ve seen it too many times: a MedTech startup rushes to outsource to save time. A few months later, they realize they don’t have the medical device documentation required to prove compliance, transfer manufacturing, or pass a regulatory inspection.

If your device lives in someone else’s Dropbox — in another time zone, with no real documentation trail — you don’t control your product.

And you’re not ready for scale.

What Most Teams Miss About Medical Device Documentation

Medical device documentation isn’t paperwork. It’s evidence of control — of design, quality, change, and responsibility.

But when you hand over development to a low-cost vendor overseas, your documentation often disappears behind assumptions:

“They’ll send us everything at the end.”
“We’ll collect files once it’s validated.”
“It’s just an SOP, we can write it later.”

Meanwhile, your technical file is fragmented, your risk file is outdated, and your DMR doesn’t match your production unit.

This isn’t a clerical issue. It’s a business risk.

The Quiet Ways Documentation Fails — and Costs You Everything

Let’s look at how these failures show up, and what experienced device developers actually do to avoid them:

🧠 Medical Device Documentation: 4 Critical Failures When Working with Chinese Manufacturers

Failure	What Most Teams Assume	What Really Happens	Bold, Actionable Advice
1. No Access to the DMR/DHF (Device Master Record / Design History File)	“The manufacturer is handling documentation, we’ll get it when we need it.”	Many Chinese CMs treat DMR/DHF files as internal assets — or don’t produce them in English or to ISO 13485/FDA QSR standards. You end up with incomplete or unusable documentation.	Negotiate DMR ownership in writing. Demand editable source files. Build your own DMR concurrently with engineering milestones. Assign internal or partner QA to oversee real-time documentation.
2. Missing Validation Reports (IQ/OQ/PQ)	“We’ve tested the device — we’re good.”	The factory may run tests, but not according to FDA/CE expectations. Without formal Installation, Operational, and Performance Qualification documents, you can’t pass regulatory audits.	Require protocol drafts before production. Schedule witnessed validations or request full video evidence. Align IQ/OQ/PQ with your notified body’s expectations before building.
3. Undocumented Engineering Changes	“We sent them an updated file — they used it.”	Many changes are implemented without ECNs (Engineering Change Notices) or version control. You lose traceability, which invalidates parts of your design history and V\&V logic.	Mandate a formal ECO process. Every revision must be logged, approved, and reflected in the DHF. Keep a parallel version map in-house.
4. Incomplete or Local-Language SOPs	“The factory trains operators — they know what to do.”	Most SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) exist only in Mandarin and are often tribal knowledge. This makes external audits impossible and puts you at massive risk during transfers or inspections.	Require English SOPs for all critical processes, signed off by your QA lead. Consider dual-language versions. If SOPs don’t exist — build them with the factory as part of the NPI process.

These are not isolated problems. They are symptoms of a larger issue: you assumed documentation would happen automatically.

OVA Solutions: Where Documentation is Part of the Design

At OVA Solutions, we treat medical device documentation as an output of engineering — not a side task for the intern.

We:

Create real-time DHF and DMR libraries aligned with ISO 13485
Embed documentation control into every hardware milestone
Require full traceability from prototype through NPI
Validate supplier documentation in advance of handover

We’ve rebuilt medical device documentation for companies who were 80% through development — and 0% ready for audit. We’d rather help you avoid that.

Because documentation doesn’t start with a template. It starts with thinking like a regulator from day one.

A Real Case: \$400K Lost to a Missing Test Protocol

A MedTech founder came to us after their FDA submission stalled. Why?

Their manufacturer “forgot” to archive IQ/OQ data. No signed protocols. No validation reports. Just internal QC logs in Mandarin.

The device worked. The product was solid. But the medical device documentation wasn’t acceptable.

They had two choices:

Re-do testing, delaying launch by 7 months
Fire the CM, rebuild from scratch, and write a CAPA that would satisfy regulators

We helped them recover with:

A complete DHF rebuild
Fresh validation under a controlled protocol
A new DMR with full QA signoff

But they still lost $400K and nearly missed their investment milestone.

“Can’t We Just Fix It Later?”

No.

Without clean, accessible, regulator-ready medical device documentation, you can’t:

File your submission
Transfer manufacturing
Survive an audit
Defend your design

And you can’t scale.

If your documentation lives in spreadsheets, emails, and chat threads — it doesn’t exist.

The Real Cost of Weak Documentation

✅ You lose trust with regulators
✅ You delay every submission
✅ You increase your recall risk
✅ You lock yourself to one factory forever
✅ You scare off investors doing diligence

The irony? Most of this happens before you even notice. By the time you need the documentation — it’s already too late.

So What Should You Do Now?

Ask your current CM for the full DMR and SOP stack
Check if your validation reports are signed and stored
Review your own ECO logs for every revision
Align your internal QA plan with ISO 13485 doc controls

If you can’t do that today — your medical device documentation is a liability.

This Is What We Fix — Before It Breaks You

OVA isn’t a design agency. We’re an engineering team that builds documentation into your hardware stack.

We’ve helped MedTech founders:

Restore lost traceability
Recover from failed audits
Rebuild documentation fast enough to save regulatory deadlines

And we do it by making medical device documentation part of the initial architecture, not an afterthought.

Want to Stay Compliant Without Losing Speed?

Need to know if your documentation is actually submission-ready?
Not sure your design history file would survive scrutiny?

Let’s talk.

Strong medical device documentation is what separates scalable companies from stalled prototypes. And we’ll show you how to build it right.

📅 Book a call with our CEO: https://calendly.com/lisa-voronkova/30min

Maybe You Like

Medical Device Documentation: 4 Critical Failures When Working with Chinese Manufacturers

May 9, 2025

Medical Device Documentation: 4 Critical Failures When Working with Chinese Manufacturers